Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/lotuselise.jpg

Lotus Elise

It is very high-quality and has a resolution of 500 x 333; Rodrigol created this image. It is licensed under the GNU.

Nominate and support. - Sir Grant the Small 11:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - low resolution, angle of shot doesn't show full car, photo includes distracting elements such as another car. SteveHopson 13:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the same reasons as SteveHopson, bad angle and lo res make this not featured quality... it's a nice car though. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 13:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Resolution way too low, background suboptimal. The angle is "dramatic" but does not give a good overview of the car. --Dschwen 13:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Its all been said. Low resolution and poor angle which hides/disguises the actual shape of the entire car. Not FP to me. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 20:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too small. Nice car, can you get a better shot? -Ravedave 20:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppppse far too small. chowells 00:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The dramatic angle and in-your-face look are dynamic and attractive. I don't think a photo has to show the full car to be featured. Front views, 3/4, side views all have a place. Still, Wikipedia (as distinct from Commons), being an encyclopedia, places more emphasis on information content than excitement. Fg2 02:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too small, bad angle —M e ts501^talk 03:23, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Terrible resolution, the background is distracting --Pharaoh Hound 14:20, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, I don't like the angle -- BWF89 02:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted howch e ng {chat} 18:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]